<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Opuscula Selecta &#187; church history</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.juniusinstitute.org/blog/tag/church-history/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.juniusinstitute.org/blog</link>
	<description>The Junius Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2020 15:47:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.7.41</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Digital Research Is Not Optional</title>
		<link>http://www.juniusinstitute.org/blog/digital-research-is-not-optional/</link>
		<comments>http://www.juniusinstitute.org/blog/digital-research-is-not-optional/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 00:19:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jordan Ballor]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Research Method]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[church history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[james e. bradley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research methods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[richard a. muller]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.juniusinstitute.org/blog/?p=33</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;We believe that the newer technology, understood broadly, is no longer optional. The scholar who neglects current technological advances in the manipulation and accessing of sources puts himself or herself in the position of the student who refuses to adopt &#8230; <a href="http://www.juniusinstitute.org/blog/digital-research-is-not-optional/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.eerdmans.com/Products/Default.aspx?ISBN=9780802808264"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-34" alt="Church History" src="http://www.juniusinstitute.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/ResizeImageHandler.jpg" width="165" height="251" /></a>
<p style="text-align: left;"><em>&#8220;We believe that the newer technology, understood broadly, is no longer optional. The scholar who neglects current technological advances in the manipulation and accessing of sources puts himself or herself in the position of the student who refuses to adopt the methodological advances of the Enlightenment; they become, by definition, precritical. The areas in which students can safely ignore the new methods and source mediums are becoming fewer, and even those scholars working in areas as yet untouched by this technology can still benefit from an exposure to the conceptual elegance of unimpeded research, and exhaustive, near-perfect bibliographies.&#8221;</em></p>
<p style="text-align: right;">&#8211;James E. Bradley and Richard A. Muller, <em><a href="http://www.eerdmans.com/Products/Default.aspx?ISBN=9780802808264">Church History: An Introduction to Research, Reference Works, and Methods</a></em> (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1995), p. 74.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.juniusinstitute.org/blog/digital-research-is-not-optional/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
